Director of Child Support Enforcement Bureau v. Fariello

74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10705
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 905 (Director of Child Support Enforcement Bureau v. Fariello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Director of Child Support Enforcement Bureau v. Fariello, 74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a proceeding by the Director of the Child Support Enforcement Bureau to have a payroll deduction order entered, pursuant to section 49-b of the Personal Property Law, for accumulated arrears owed to the Department of Social Services, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, entered January 11, 1979, which denied the application and vacated all arrears. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition granted, and the proceeding is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, to determine the amount of arrears owed to the Department of Social Services and for the entry of an appropriate payroll deduction order. The arrears in question accrued under an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 14, 1974, not under the separation agreement. While the separation agreement made no provision for the support of respondent’s stepchildren, the order of support of the Family Court required respondent "to pay to the Suffolk County Department of Probation the sum of $50.00 per week beginning March 8, 1974 for the support of his Dependents) named in the Petition”. The petition named respondent’s wife and his two stepchildren. In requiring respondent to pay support for his stepchildren to the Department of Probation, the Family Court acted within its authority. Under section 415 of the Family Court Act, [906]*906a stepparent is responsible for the support of stepchildren under the age of 21 years if the children are recipients of public assistance. Accordingly, the director is entitled to recover the arrears in question. Titone, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Carolina Department of Social Services v. James C. D.
119 Misc. 2d 649 (NYC Family Court, 1983)
Buscaglia ex rel. Tutko v. Tutko
86 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/director-of-child-support-enforcement-bureau-v-fariello-nyappdiv-1980.