Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas
This text of 176 So. 2d 68 (Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because of an apparent jurisdictional conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari, and have heard arguments on jurisdiction and merits.
Upon further careful study of the briefs and record we have concluded that the decision of the District Court does not collide with prior decisions of the Court or other District Courts on the points of law decided.
We find, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/direct-transport-co-of-florida-v-rakaskas-fla-1965.