Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas

Supreme Court of Florida

Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas

176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 2, 1965·No. No. 33808·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of an apparent jurisdictional conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari, and have heard arguments on jurisdiction and merits.

Upon further careful study of the briefs and record we have concluded that the decision of the District Court does not collide with prior decisions of the Court or other District Courts on the points of law decided.

We find, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because of an apparent jurisdictional conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari, and have heard arguments on jurisdiction and merits.

Upon further careful study of the briefs and record we have concluded that the decision of the District Court does not collide with prior decisions of the Court or other District Courts on the points of law decided.

We find, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas, 176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

176 So. 2d 68 (Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related