Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas

176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 1965
DocketNo. 33808
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 So. 2d 68 (Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Direct Transport Co. of Florida v. Rakaskas, 176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of an apparent jurisdictional conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari, and have heard arguments on jurisdiction and merits.

Upon further careful study of the briefs and record we have concluded that the decision of the District Court does not collide with prior decisions of the Court or other District Courts on the points of law decided.

We find, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stockett v. Tolin
791 F. Supp. 1536 (S.D. Florida, 1992)
Erp v. Carroll
438 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 68, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/direct-transport-co-of-florida-v-rakaskas-fla-1965.