Dipple v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dipple v. Pittsburgh

95 A.2d 925, 373 Pa. 307, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 305

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 13, 1953

DocketAppeal, 15

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 95 A.2d 925 (Dipple v. Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dipple v. Pittsburgh, 95 A.2d 925, 373 Pa. 307, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 305 (Pa. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal in this case was not taken within three calendar months, as prescribed by statute, after the *308 order of the court below was entered. Therefore, lacking jurisdiction, we are obliged to quash the appeal of our own motion, which we do the less reluctantly because of the satisfactory disposition by Judge Marshall, speaking for the court en banc, of the questions submitted to the court in the case stated.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal in this case was not taken within three calendar months, as prescribed by statute, after the *308 order of the court below was entered. Therefore, lacking jurisdiction, we are obliged to quash the appeal of our own motion, which we do the less reluctantly because of the satisfactory disposition by Judge Marshall, speaking for the court en banc, of the questions submitted to the court in the case stated.

Appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.2d 925, 373 Pa. 307, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dipple-v-pittsburgh-pa-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack