DiPizio Constr. Co., Inc. v. Erie Canal Harbor Dev. Corp.
2017 NY Slip Op 4767
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2017
DocketMot. 209/17 CA 16-00194
StatusPublished
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4767 (DiPizio Constr. Co., Inc. v. Erie Canal Harbor Dev. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DiPizio Constr. Co., Inc. v. Erie Canal Harbor Dev. Corp., 2017 NY Slip Op 4767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
DiPizio Constr. Co., Inc. v Erie Canal Harbor Dev. Corp. (2017 NY Slip Op 04767)
Decided on June 9, 2017
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. (Filed June 9, 2017.)
MOTION NO. (209/17) CA 16-00194.
| DiPizio Constr. Co., Inc. v Erie Canal Harbor Dev. Corp. |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 04767 |
| Decided on June 9, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 9, 2017
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. (Filed June 9, 2017.)
MOTION NO. (209/17) CA 16-00194.
[*1]DIPIZIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 1.)
DIPIZIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 2.)
DIPIZIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT, ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SAM HOYT, THOMAS DEE AND MARK E. SMITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 3.)
v
ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 1.)
DIPIZIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 2.)
DIPIZIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT, ERIE CANAL HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SAM HOYT, THOMAS DEE AND MARK E. SMITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 3.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 431
New York JUD § 431
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dipizio-constr-co-inc-v-erie-canal-harbor-dev-corp-nyappdiv-2017.