DiPietro v. Griefer

732 So. 2d 323, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 191, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 660, 1999 WL 232628
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 22, 1999·No. No. 93,038·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Griefer v. DiPietro, 708 So.2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in order to resolve what appeared to be express and direct conflict with Alvarado v. Rice, 614 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1993), and Rockman v. Barnes, 672 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, upon closer examination, we find no conflict and find review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

[324]*324HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.

ANSTEAD, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DiPietro v. Griefer, 732 So. 2d 323, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 191, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 660, 1999 WL 232628 (Fla. 1999).

732 So. 2d 323 (DiPietro v. Griefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Castellano
764 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)