DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC
10 A.3d 1053, 299 Conn. 920, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 471
Opinion
The petition by the defendants Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, Dimensional Technology Group, LLC, and Paul DiTommaso, Jr., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 583 (AC 29175), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly rule that expert testimony was not required in a negligence case wherein the plaintiff claimed that the defendants had installed an inherently dangerous carpet in its indoor soccer arena, and where there was no evidence that the defendants had notice of the danger?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly rule that plenary review applied to the trial court’s decision concerning the admissibility of expert testimony in a summary judgment motion?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 10 A.3d 1053, 299 Conn. 920, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 471 (Colo. 2010).
10 A.3d 1053 (DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance
59 A.3d 247 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
SUMMITWOOD DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. Roberts
25 A.3d 721 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Romprey v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
21 A.3d 889 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Milliun v. New Milford Hospital
20 A.3d 36 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)