DiPasquale v. DiPasquale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DiPasquale v. DiPasquale

275 So. 3d 686

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2019

DocketCase No. 2D17-2266; 2D17-2267 CONSOLIDATED

StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 686 (DiPasquale v. DiPasquale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiPasquale v. DiPasquale, 275 So. 3d 686 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Bruno DiPasquale appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lisette DiPasquale and from the order denying his motion to modify the parties' partial marital settlement agreement (PMSA). We affirm without prejudice to Mr. DiPasquale asserting the arguments he has raised in this appeal in a subsequent petition for modification. Cf. Dogoda v. Dogoda, 233 So.3d 484, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("In cases involving an MSA, the effective date of the agreement establishes the date to which a trial court should look in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances was contemplated by the parties.").

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Bruno DiPasquale appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lisette DiPasquale and from the order denying his motion to modify the parties' partial marital settlement agreement (PMSA). We affirm without prejudice to Mr. DiPasquale asserting the arguments he has raised in this appeal in a subsequent petition for modification. Cf. Dogoda v. Dogoda, 233 So.3d 484, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("In cases involving an MSA, the effective date of the agreement establishes the date to which a trial court should look in determining whether a substantial change in circumstances was contemplated by the parties.").

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 So. 3d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dipasquale-v-dipasquale-fladistctapp-2019.