DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert

Connecticut Appellate Court

DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert

606 A.2d 1333, 27 Conn. App. 613, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 203

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMay 26, 1992

Docket9862

StatusPublished

This text of 606 A.2d 1333 (DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert, 606 A.2d 1333, 27 Conn. App. 613, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 203 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a breach of contract suit brought by the plaintiff builder against the defendant purchasers. Written interrogatories were submitted to the jury which found that the plaintiff had “not proven” that it was ready, willing and able to perform its obligations under the contract. This was a question of fact that was resolved against the plaintiff and is disposi-tive of the appeal.

Factual issues raised in the counterclaim were resolved against the defendants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a breach of contract suit brought by the plaintiff builder against the defendant purchasers. Written interrogatories were submitted to the jury which found that the plaintiff had “not proven” that it was ready, willing and able to perform its obligations under the contract. This was a question of fact that was resolved against the plaintiff and is disposi-tive of the appeal.

Factual issues raised in the counterclaim were resolved against the defendants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

606 A.2d 1333, 27 Conn. App. 613, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dipasquale-construction-corp-v-zinnert-connappct-1992.