Diop v. Coleman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Diop v. Coleman

667 So. 2d 507, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1996 WL 50891

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3267

StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 507 (Diop v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diop v. Coleman, 667 So. 2d 507, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1996 WL 50891 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Although with some reluctance because we are aware that a disqualification motion can be used to remove a judge who has merely made prior unfavorable rulings, nevertheless, under the facts of this case, we grant the Writ of Prohibition and direct that future matters involving petitioner herein be assigned to another judge. Feuerman v. Overby, 638 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Levine v. State, 650 So.2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

Although with some reluctance because we are aware that a disqualification motion can be used to remove a judge who has merely made prior unfavorable rulings, nevertheless, under the facts of this case, we grant the Writ of Prohibition and direct that future matters involving petitioner herein be assigned to another judge. Feuerman v. Overby, 638 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Levine v. State, 650 So.2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 507, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1996 WL 50891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diop-v-coleman-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack