Dionisio Del Cid v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

829 F.2d 1119, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 25, 1987
Docket87-3553
StatusUnpublished

This text of 829 F.2d 1119 (Dionisio Del Cid v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dionisio Del Cid v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 829 F.2d 1119, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

829 F.2d 1119
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dionisio DEL CID, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 87-3553.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 28, 1987.
Decided Sept. 25, 1987.

William Peter Van Wyke, for appellant.

Rebecca House Thompson, Robert L. Bombaugh, David J. Kline, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dionisio Del Cid petitions for review of the denial of a stay of deportation pending a ruling on his administrative motion to reopen deportation proceedings. Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, this Court's jurisdiction is limited to review of final orders of deportation. 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1105a(a) (West 1970 and Supp.1987). The weight of authority holds that the stay denial is not an appealable final order. Reid v. INS, 766 F.2d 113 (3d Cir.1985); Bonilla v. INS, 711 F.2d 43 (5th Cir.1983); Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir.1983); Reyes v. INS, 571 F.2d 505 (9th Cir.1978). We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this petition.

Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 F.2d 1119, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dionisio-del-cid-v-united-states-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca4-1987.