Diondra Williams v. Dumaguindin

Opinion

DIONDRA WILLIAMS as G.A.L for Case No. 2:20-CV-09042 VAP (ASx) “S.M.”, SOLEMULI AFAESE as Consol. w/ 2:20-CV-09350 VAP (ASx) G.A.L. for “A.M.”, & IRENE Consol. w/ 5:20-CV-02252 VAP (ASx) Plaintiffs. [Hon. Dist. Judge Virginia A. Phillips Mag. Judge Alka Sagar] v. [DISCOVERY MATTER] DUMAGUINDIN, OFC. C. ROSA PROTECTIVE ORDER PASADENA, & CHIEF JOHN PEREZ, individually and in their official capacities and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Complaint Filed: 11/26/19 Trial Date: Not Yet Set Defendants. ARCHIE BARRY, individually and as successor-in-interest for Decedent, Anthony McClain Plaintiff. v. EDWIN DUMAGUINDIN, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. BAM, a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Kimberly Jenkins, individually and as successor in interest to ANTHONY GUYDALE McCLAIN, Plaintiffs. v. CITY OF PASADENA, PASADENA POLICE JOHN PEREZ, OFFICERS EDWIN DUMAGUINDIN, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. Discovery in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection frompublicdisclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting or defending this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal, except to the extent specified herein; Central District Local Rules 79-5.1 and 79-5 set(s) forth theprocedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. Nothing in this Stipulation or associated Order shall be construed so as to require or mandate that any Party disclose or produce privileged information or records that could be designated as Confidential Documents/Protected Material Contentions re Harm from Disclosure of Confidential Materials. This action is likely to involve law enforcement investigative files, other law enforcement agency records, peace officer personnel records and medical records for whichspecialprotectionfrompublicdisclosure,includingdisclosureorreleasetoany news media, member of the press, website, or any other public forum (except as permitted under section 12 regarding filings with the court in this action and under seal) and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, materials relating to the investigation of an incident involving decedent and officers of the Pasadena Police Department, peace officer personnel files, medical records including information implicating privacy rights of third parties, and informationotherwisegenerallyunavailabletothepublic,orwhichmaybeprivileged orotherwiseprotected fromdisclosureunder state orfederal statutes,court rules,case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitatethepromptresolutionofdisputesoverconfidentialityofdiscoverymaterials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Defendants contend that there is good cause and a particularized need for a personnel file records and associated investigative or confidential records for the following reasons. Defendants contend that peace officers have a federal privilege of privacy in their personnel file records: a reasonable expectation of privacy therein that is underscored, specified, and arguably heightened by the Pitchess protective procedure of California law. See Sanchez v. Santa Ana Police Dept., 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-1034 (9th Cir. 1990); Hallon v. City of Stockton, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14665, *2-3, 12- 13 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (concluding that “while “[f]ederal law applies to privilege based discovery disputes involving federal claims,” the “state privilege law which is consistent with its federal equivalent significantly assists in applying [federal] privilege law to discovery disputes”); Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 613 n. 4, 616 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (peace officers have constitutionally-based “privacy rights [that] are not inconsequential” in their police personnel records); cf. Cal. Penal Code §§ 832.7, 832.8; Cal. Evid. Code §§ 1040-1047. Defendants further contend that uncontrolled disclosure of such personnel file information can threaten the safety of non-party witnesses, officers, and their families/associates. Second, defendants contend that municipalities and law enforcement agencies have federal deliberative-executive process privilege, federal official information privilege, federal law enforcement privilege, and federal attorney-client privilege (and/orattorneyworkproductprotection)interestsinthepersonnelfilesoftheirpeace officers – particularlyas to those portions of peace officer personnel files that contain critical self-analysis, internal deliberation/decision-making or evaluation/analysis, or communications for the purposes of obtaining or rendering legal advice or analysis – potentially including but not limited to evaluative/analytical portions of Internal Affairs type records or reports, evaluative/analytical portions of supervisory records or reports, and/or reports prepared at the direction of counsel, or for the purpose of obtaining or rendering legal advice. See Sanchez, 936 F.2d at 1033-1034; Maricopa 1997); Soto, 162 F.R.D. at 613, 613 n. 4; Kelly v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 654, 668-671 (N.D. Cal. 1987); Tuite v. Henry, 181 F.R.D. 175, 176-177 (D. D.C. 1998); Hamstreet v. Duncan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89702 (D. Or. 2007); Admiral Ins. Co. v. United States Dist. Ct., 881 F.2d 1486, 1492, 1495 (9th Cir. 1988). Defendants further contend that such personnel file records are restricted from disclosure by the public entity’s custodian of records pursuant to applicable California law and that uncontrolled release is likely to result in needless intrusion of officer privacy; impairment in the collection of third-party witness information and statements and related legitimate lawenforcement investigations/interests; and achilling of open and honest discussion regarding and/or investigation into alleged misconduct that can erode a public entity’s ability to identify and/or implement any remedial measures that may be required. Third,defendantscontendthat,sincepeaceofficersdonothavethesame rights as other private citizens to avoid giving compelled statements, it is contrary to the fundamental principles of fairness to permit uncontrolled release of officers’ compelled statements. See generally Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles, 40 Cal.3d 822, 828-830 (1985); cf. U.S. Const., amend V. Accordingly, defendants contend that, without a protective order preventing such, production of confidential records in the case can and will likely substantially impair and harm defendant public entity’s interests in candid self-critical analysis, frank internal deliberations, obtaining candid information from witnesses, preserving the safety of witnesses, preserving the safety of peace officers and peace officers’ families and associates, protecting the privacy officers of peace officers, and preventing pending investigations from being detrimentally undermined by publication of private, sensitive, or confidential information – as can and often does result in litigation. Plaintiffs do not agree with and do not stipulate to Defendants’ contentions parties’ disagreement, or bind them, concerning the legal statements and claimed privileges set forth above. However, plaintiffs agree that there is Good Cause for a Protective Order so as to preserve the respective interests of the parties while streamlining the process of resolving any disagreements. The parties jointly contend that there is typically a particularized need for protection as to any medical or psychotherapeutic records and autopsy photographs, because of the privacy interests at stake therein. Because of these sensitive interests, a Court Order should address these documents rather than a private agreement between the parties. The parties therefore stipulate that there is Good Cause for, and hereby jointly request that the honorable Court issue/enter, a Protective Order re confidential documents consistent with the terms and provisions of this Stipulation. However, the entry of a Protective Order by the Court pursuant to this Stipulation shall not be construed as any ruling by the Court on the aforementioned legal statements or privilege claims in this section (§ 1), nor shall this section be construed as part of any such Court Order. 2. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 Action: this pending federal law suit and other consolidated or related actions. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or applicable federal privileges. This material includes, but is not limited to, medical records,psychotherapeuticrecords,and autopsyphotographs; aswell as peace officer and theassociatedcase law; and othersimilar confidentialrecordsdesignated assuch. 2.4 Counsel(withoutqualifier):OutsideCounselandHouseCounsel(aswell as their support staffs). 2.5 DesignatingParty:aPartyorNon-PartypublicentityemployerofaParty that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things), that are produced – or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery – by any Party in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained bya Partyor its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s; as well as any person retained, designated, or disclosed by a Party as an expert pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) or other applicable discovery Rules or statutes. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party (as well as their support staffs). 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 OutsideCounsel:attorneyswhoarenotemployeesofaPartybutwho are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action (as well as their support staffs). 2.11 Party: any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, agents, consultants, retained experts, house counsel, and outside counsel (and/or their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or noticed or subpoenaed by another Party; additionally, for the limited purpose of designating testimony subject to this Stipulation and Order pursuant to section 6.2(b) (infra), a “Producing Party” shall also be construed to include a Party that is attending and/or participating in a non-party deposition noticed/subpoenaed by another Party. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations,andorganizing,storing,orretrievingdatainanyformormedium)and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. (The term “Confidential Document” shall be synonymous with the term “Protected Material” for the purposes of this Stipulation and any associated Protective Order.) 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material fromaProducingParty,includingaPartythathasnoticedorsubpoenaedandistaking a deposition or comparable testimony. 3. SCOPE. TheprotectionsconferredbythisStipulationandOrdercovernotonlyProtected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and its associated Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. AnyuseofProtectedMaterialattrialshallbegovernedbytheOrdersofthetrial judge: This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4. DURATION. Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposedbythisOrdershallremainineffectuntilaDesignatingPartyagreesotherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Finaldispositionshallbedeemedtobethelaterof(1)dismissalof allclaimsand defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL. 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations thatareshowntobeclearlyunjustifiedorthathavebeenmadeforanimproperpurpose unnecessaryexpensesandburdensonotherparties) mayexposethe DesignatingParty to sanctions. If it comes to a Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection asserted, that Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings, and regardless of whether produced in hardcopy or electronic form), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to eachpage that contains Protected Material. If onlya portionor portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearlyidentifytheprotected portion(s) (e.g.,bymaking appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion that it is “CONFIDENTIAL.” The placement of such “CONFIDENTIAL” stamp on such page(s) shall not obstruct the substance of the page’s (or pages’) text or content. A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, orportionsthereof,qualifyforprotectionunderthis Order.Then,beforeproducingthe to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identifytheprotectedportion(s)(e.g.,bymakingappropriatemarkingsinthemargins). (b) for testimony given in depositions or in other pretrial proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimonythat is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Producing Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulation and its associated Protective Order. The court reporter must affix to each such transcript page containing Protected Material the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” as instructed by the Producing Party. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items (including but not limited to information produced on disc or electronic data storage device), that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on theexteriorofthe containeror containersinwhichtheinformationisstoredthelegend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying the material as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected (preferably though not necessarily, within 30 days of production or disclosure of such material), an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items as "CONFIDENTIAL" this Order for such material. Ifmaterialisappropriatelydesignatedas“CONFIDENTIAL”afterthematerial was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with this Stipulation and its associated Order. 5.4 Alteration of Confidentiality Stamp Prohibited. A Receiving Party shall not alter, edit, or modify any Protected Material so as to conceal, obscure, or remove a “CONFIDENTIAL” stamp or legend thereon; nor shall a Receiving Party take any other action so as to make it appear that Protected Material is not subject to the terms and provisions of this Stipulation and its associated Order. However, nothing in this section shall be construed so as to prevent a Receiving Party from challenging a confidentiality designation subject to the provisions of section 6, infra. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS. 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s Scheduling Order. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 6.2 Meet and Confer. Prior to challenging a confidentiality designation, a Challenging Party shall initiate a dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each specific designation it is challenging, and describing the basis (and supporting authority or argument) for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue, either in person, telephonically, or by other comparable means, but not by correspondence) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. Inconferring,theChallengingPartymustexplainthespecificbasisforitsbelief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishesthattheDesignatingPartyisunwillingtoparticipateinthemeetandconfer process in a timely manner. 6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a confidentiality challenge without court intervention, the Challenging Party shall file and serve a motion to remove confidentiality (under the applicable rules for filing and service of discovery motions) within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, or by the first day of trial of this matter, whichever date is earlier – unless the parties agree in writing to a longer time. The parties must strictly comply with Central District Local Rules 37-1 and 37- 2 (including the joint stipulation re discovery dispute requirement) in any motion associated with this Protective Order. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the precedingparagraph. Inaddition,theChallengingPartymayfileamotionchallenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party, regardless of whether the Designating Party is the moving party or whether such Party sought or opposes judicial intervention. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to oppose a motion to remove confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 6.4. Withdrawal of “CONFIDENTIAL” Designation. At its discretion, a DesignatingPartymayremoveProtectedMaterial/ConfidentialDocumentsfromsome or all of the protections and provisions of this Stipulation and its associated Order at any time by any of the following methods: (a) Express Written Withdrawal. A Designating Party may withdraw a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material /Confidential Documents fromsome or all of theprotections of this Stipulation and its associated Order by an express withdrawal in a writing signed by such Party (or such Party’s Counsel, but not including staff of such Counsel) that specifies and itemizes the Disclosure or Discovery Material previously designated as Protected Material/Confidential Documents that shall no longer be subject to all or some of the provisions of this Stipulation and Order. Such express withdrawal shall be effective when transmitted or served upon the Receiving Party. If a Designating Party is withdrawing Protected Material from only some of the provisions/ protections of this Stipulation and Order, such Party must state which specific provisions are no longer to be enforced as to the specified material for which confidentiality protection hereunder is withdrawn: otherwise, such withdrawal shall be construed as a and Order; (b) Express Withdrawal on the Record. A Designating Party may withdraw a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents from all of the provisions/protections of this StipulationanditsassociatedOrderbyverballyconsentingincourtproceedingsonthe record to such withdrawal – provided that such withdrawal specifies the Disclosure or Discovery Material previously designated as Protected Material/ Confidential Documents that shall no longer be subject to any of the provisions of this Stipulation and Order. A Designating Party is not permitted to withdraw Protected Material from only some of the protections/provisions of this Stipulation and Order by this method; (c) Implicit Withdrawal by Publication or Failure to Oppose Challenge. A Designating Party shall be construed to have withdrawn a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents from alloftheprovisions/protectionsofthisStipulationandOrderbyeither(1)makingsuch Protected Material/Confidential Records part of the public record – including but not limited to attaching such as exhibits to any filing with the court without moving, prior to such filing, for the court to seal such records; or (2) failing to timely oppose a Challenging Party’s motion to remove a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation to specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be construed so as to require any Party to file Protected Material/Confidential Documents under seal, unless expressly specified herein. 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL. 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Actiononlyforpreparing,prosecuting,defending,orattemptingtosettlethislitigation – up to and including final disposition of the above-entitled action – and not for any Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a ReceivingPartymaydiscloseanyinformationoritemdesignated“CONFIDENTIAL” only to: (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of such Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action – each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by this Stipulation and Order; (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosureisreasonablynecessaryforthisAction–eachofwhom,byacceptingreceipt of such Protected material, thereby agree to be bound by this Stipulation and Order. (d) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation – each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by this Stipulation and Order; (e) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have (f) the author or custodian of a document containing the information that constitutesProtectedMaterial,oracustodianorotherpersonwhootherwisepossessed or knew the information; (g) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary – each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by this Stipulation and Order. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must have a confidential designation affixed by the court reporter to such pages containing Protected Material and such may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulation and its Protective Order. (h) the author or custodian of a document containing the information that constitutes Protected Material, or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.3. Notice of Confidentiality. Prior to producing or disclosing Protected Material/Confidential Documents to persons to whom this Stipulation and its Order permits disclosure or production (see section 8.2, supra), a Receiving Party shall provide a copy of this Stipulation and Order to such persons so as to put such persons on notice as to the restrictions imposed upon them herein: except that, for court reporters, Professional Vendors, and for witnesses being provided with Protected Materialduringadeposition,itshallbesufficientnoticeforCounselfortheReceiving Party to give the witness a verbal admonition (on the record, for witnesses) regarding the provisions of this Stipulation and its Order and such provisions’ applicability to specified Protected Material at issue. 7.4. Reservation of Rights. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be construed so as to require any Producing Party to designate any records or materials as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be construed so as to prevent the admission of Protected Material into evidence at the trial of this Disclosure or Discovery Material has been designated as Protected Material/Confidential Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be construed as a waiver of any privileges or of any rights to object to the use or admission into evidence of any Protected Material in any proceeding; nor shallanything herein be construed as a concession that anyprivileges asserted or objections made are valid or applicable. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be construed so as to prevent the Designating Party (or its Counsel or custodian of records) from having access to and using Protected Material designated bythat Partyin the manner in which such persons or entities would typicallyuse such materials in the normal course of their duties or profession – except that the waiver of confidentiality provisions shall apply (see section 6.4(c), supra). 7.5. Requirement to File Confidential Documents Under Seal. Confidential Documents may be submitted in all law and motion proceedings before the Court if done so under seal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5.2 and 26 and/or UnitedStates DistrictCourt,Central District ofCaliforniaLocalRules79-5.1 and 79- 5.2 (as applicable) and pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation and any associatedOrder. IfanyReceivingPartyattachesanyConfidentialDocumentstoany pleading, motion, or other paper to be filed, lodged, or otherwise submitted to the Court, such Confidential Document(s) shall be filed/lodged under seal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5.2 and 26 and/or United States District Court, Central District of California Local Rules 79-5.1 and 79-5.2 to the extent applicable. However, this paragraph (¶ 7.5) shall not be construed so as to prevent a Designating Party or counsel from submitting, filing, lodging, or publishing any document it has previously designated as a Confidential Document without compliance with this paragraph’s requirement to do so under seal (i.e., a producing- disclosing party or counsel may submit or publish its own Confidential Documents without being in violation of the terms of this Stipulation and its Protective Order). this paragraph as to any specifically identified Confidential Document(s) where – prior to the submission or publication of the Confidential Document(s) at issue – the Designating Party of such specifically identified Confidential Document(s) has waived/withdrawn the protections of this Stipulation and its Order (pursuant to paragraph 6.4, supra). A Receiving Party shall also be exempt from the sealing requirements of this paragraph(¶7.5)wheretheConfidentialDocuments/ProtectedMaterialatissueis/are not documents, records, or information regarding or incorporating: (1) private, personal information contained in peace officer personnel files (such as social security numbers, driver’s license numbers or comparable personal government identification numbers, residential addresses, compensation or pension or personal property information, credit card numbers or credit information, dates of birth, tax records and information, information related to the identity of an officer’s family members or co-residents, and comparable personal information about the officer or his family); (2) any internal affairs or comparable investigation by any law enforcement agency into alleged officer misconduct; and/or (3) the medical records or records of psychiatric or psychological treatment of any peace officer or party to this action. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to bind the Court or its authorized staff so as to limit or prevent the publication of any Confidential Documents to the jury or factfinder, at the time of trial of this matter, where the Court has deemed such Confidential Documents to be admissible into evidence. Nothing in this Stipulation or in any associated Order shall be construed as any entitlement for the parties to file any documents or materials under seal; nor shall the parties’ Stipulation or this Order be construed as any exemption from any of the requirements of Central District Local Rule 79-5. The parties are required to comply for filing material under seal, that material may be filed in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court. 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party, preferably (though not necessarily) by facsimile or electronic mail. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by all sides in any such situation, while adhering to the terms of this Stipulated Order. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with thesubpoenaorcourtordershallnotproduceanyinformationdesignatedinthisaction as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The DesignatingPartyshallbeartheburdenandexpenseofseekingprotectioninthatcourt of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. The purpose of this section is to ensure that the affected Partyhasa meaningful opportunity to preserve its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 9.ANON-PARTY’SPROTECTEDMATERIALSOUGHTTOBEPRODUCEDIN (a) Thetermsofthis Orderareapplicabletoinformationproducedbya Non- Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information producedbyNon-Partiesinconnectionwiththislitigationisprotectedbytheremedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall: (1) promptlynotify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested; and (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party, if requested. (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If theNon-Partytimelyseeks aprotective order,theReceivingPartyshallnot produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 10. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the court. 11. PUBLICATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL PROHIBITED. 11.1. Filing of Protected Material. Without advance written permission from the all Parties, or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing ofthespecificProtectedMaterialatissue. IfaParty’srequesttofileProtectedMaterial under seal is denied by the court, then the Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 11.2. Public Dissemination of Protected Material. APartyshallnotpublish,release,post,ordisseminate ProtectedMaterialtoany persons except those specifically delineated and authorized by this Stipulation and its disseminate Protected Material/Confidential Documents to any news media, member of the press, website, or public forum(except as permitted under section 7.5 regarding filings with the court in this action and under seal). 12. MISCELLANEOUS. 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 12.3 This Stipulation may be signed in counterpart and a facsimile or electronic signature shall be valid as an original signature. 13. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within ninety (90) days after the final termination of this action (defined as the dismissal or entry of judgment by the above named court, or if an appeal is filed, the disposition of the appeal), upon written request by the Producing Party, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party – whether retained by the Receiving Party or its Counsel, Experts, Professional Vendors, agents, or any non- party to whom the Receiving Party produced or shared such records or information. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or anyother formof reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material, regardless of the medium (hardcopy, electronic, or otherwise) in which such Protected Material is stored or retained. maydestroysome or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it – unless such Protected Material is an original, in which case, the Receiving Party must obtain the Producing Party’s written consent before destroying such originalProtected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party(and,if not thesame person or entity, to the Designating Party) within ninety (90) days of the aforementioned written request by the Designating Party that specifically identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected material (in any medium, including but not limited to any hardcopy, electronic or digital copy, or otherwise). Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda filed with the court in this action, as well as any correspondence or attorney work product prepared by Counsel for the Receiving Party, even if such materials contain Protected Material; however,anysucharchivalcopiesthatcontainorconstituteProtectedMaterialremain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. This court shall retain jurisdiction in the event that a Designating Party elects to seek court sanctions for violation of this Stipulation and its Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: May 17, 2021 /s/ Caree Harper___________________ Caree Harper Attorneys for Plaintiffs Williams, as G.A.L. for “SM”, AFAESA, as G.A.L. for “AM,” and IRENE BAILEY DATED: May 17, 2021 /s/ Hang Le _____________________________ Dale K. Galipo John Burton Attorneys for Plaintiff BAM, by and through his guardian ad litem Kimberly Jenkins DATED: May 17, 2021 /s/ Michael S. Carrillo ___________________ Luis A. Carrillo Michael S. Carrillo Attorneys for Plaintiff Archie Barry DATED: May 17, 2021 /s/ Garros Chan_ __________________ Eugene P. Ramirez Mildred K. O’Linn Angela M. Powell Garros Chan Attorneys for Defendants City of Pasadena. Chief John Perez, Officer Edwin Dumaguindin, and Officer C. Rosa DATED: May 18, 2021 ___/_ _s _/_ S__a_g_a_r_______________________ Honorable Alka Sagar United States MagistrateJudge I, ___________________________________________ [print or type full name], of ___________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on [date] in the case of Diondra Williams, et al. v. Dumaguindin, et al. (case no. 2:20-cv-09042-VAP-AS). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint ___________________ [print or type full name] of ________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. Date: ________________________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ Printed name: ______________________________________ Signature: _________________________________________