Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket12-09-00230-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc. (Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NO. 12-09-00230-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DION RUDKIN, ' APPEAL FROM THE 188TH APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER, INC., APPELLEE ' GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the district clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record. Appellant appeals from a judgment signed on April 29, 2009. On August 28, 2009, this court notified the district clerk and the court reporter that their respective records were due to have been filed by August 27, 2009, but had not yet been filed. They were further informed that the court had extended the time to file their records or request an extension until September 28, 2009. The district clerk responded that Appellant had not paid the required preparation fee. On October 1, 2009, this court notified Appellant that the district clerk’s correspondence to this court stated that the reason for the delay in filing the clerk’s record was Appellant’s nonpayment of the required preparation fee. Appellant was further informed that, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full payment to the district clerk was provided on or before October 12, 2009. Appellant has neither provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Opinion delivered October 21, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dion-rudkin-v-good-shepherd-medical-center-inc-texapp-2009.