Dioguardi v. Nassau Electric R. Co.

149 N.Y.S. 1078, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7940

This text of 149 N.Y.S. 1078 (Dioguardi v. Nassau Electric R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dioguardi v. Nassau Electric R. Co., 149 N.Y.S. 1078, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Moore v. Rochester Ry. Co., 204 N. Y. 309, 97 N. E. 714, 49 L. R. A. (N. S.) 505, was presented in the briefs of counsel, and considered by this court in its decision. In view of the instruction o~ th~ trial court at folio 374 of the record, we thought that whatever error may have been made in the earlier part of the charge of the trial court was cured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. . Rochester Railway Co.
97 N.E. 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 N.Y.S. 1078, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dioguardi-v-nassau-electric-r-co-nyappdiv-1914.