Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
This text of 600 A.2d 1388 (Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have fully considered the plaintiffs’ claims and have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs as well as the record of the case. We fail to recognize how the matters of American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Gould, 213 Conn. 625, 569 A.2d 1105 (1990), and Cov[937]*937enant Ins. Co. v. Coon, 220 Conn. 30, 594 A.2d 977 (1991), are distinguishable, and accordingly find that they control the present case.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 A.2d 1388, 26 Conn. App. 936, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinwoodie-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-connappct-1992.