Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

600 A.2d 1388, 26 Conn. App. 936, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 39
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1992
Docket10158
StatusPublished

This text of 600 A.2d 1388 (Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 600 A.2d 1388, 26 Conn. App. 936, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 39 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have fully considered the plaintiffs’ claims and have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs as well as the record of the case. We fail to recognize how the matters of American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Gould, 213 Conn. 625, 569 A.2d 1105 (1990), and Cov[937]*937enant Ins. Co. v. Coon, 220 Conn. 30, 594 A.2d 977 (1991), are distinguishable, and accordingly find that they control the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Motorists Insurance v. Gould
569 A.2d 1105 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)
Covenant Insurance v. Coon
594 A.2d 977 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 A.2d 1388, 26 Conn. App. 936, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinwoodie-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-connappct-1992.