Dinverno v. State

616 So. 2d 191, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4427, 1993 WL 104883
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1993·No. No. 92-873·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the sentence imposed after a plea of guilty to grand theft (Count I) and contributing to the delinquency of a minor (Count II). On- Count I, she was sentenced to 365 days in Orange County jail, to be followed by four years of probation. On Count II, she was sentenced to 360 days in county jail, to be served consecutive to her sentence on Count I, with the sentence to be suspended if she successfully completed probation under Count I.

Defendant correctly contends, and the state concedes, that the sentence received on Count II is illegal, as explained in Ferguson v. State, 594 So.2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) and Bryant v. State, 591 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). See also Gaskins v. State, 607 So.2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

concur. GOSHORN, C.J., and HARRIS, J.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dinverno v. State, 616 So. 2d 191, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4427, 1993 WL 104883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 191 (Dinverno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
591 So. 2d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Ferguson v. State
594 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Gaskins v. State
607 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)