Dinsmore v. City of New York
This text of 221 A.D. 755 (Dinsmore v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment dismissing complaint reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The notice stating that decedent was caused to fall through the ice in the lake at Prospect Park was sufficient to enable the representatives of the city to investigate promptly the circumstances surrounding the alleged accident and the place where it was said to have occurred. In our opinion, because of the nature of the accident, the city’s representatives would not be misled by this notice. Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D. 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinsmore-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1927.