Dino Jay Antovoni v. State
This text of Dino Jay Antovoni v. State (Dino Jay Antovoni v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-04-213-CR
DINO JAY ANTOVONI APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
In two issues, appellant Dino Jay Antovoni complains about matters related to the punishment phase of his case. In his first issue, he contends the trial court erred in considering prior arrests not resulting in a conviction. But appellant has failed to brief this issue; thus, it is waived. See Howard v. State, 137 S.W.3d 282, 286 n.2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref’d).
In his second issue, appellant challenges the trial court’s refusal to allow him to impeach the credibility of a hearsay informant with evidence of his prison record and past criminal history. Appellant did not preserve this complaint for our review. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a)(1); Tex. R. Evid. 103(a)(2); Howard v. State, 962 S.W.2d 119, 122 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref’d). Moreover, appellant later was able to ask the officer questions about appellant’s prison record and criminal history without objection. Thus, we overrule appellant’s second issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
SAM J. DAY
JUSTICE
PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN, J.; and SAM J. DAY, J. (Retired, Sitting by Assignment).
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: June 9, 2005
NOTES
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dino Jay Antovoni v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dino-jay-antovoni-v-state-texapp-2005.