Dinnall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dinnall v. State

272 So. 3d 807

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2019

DocketCase No. 5D18-3497

StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 3d 807 (Dinnall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dinnall v. State, 272 So. 3d 807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

Appellant, as a juvenile, pled no contest to attempted second-degree murder with a firearm. He is serving a twenty-five-year term of incarceration with a twenty-five-year firearm minimum mandatory coupled with a review hearing that will take place after twenty years. We affirm the postconviction court's summary denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Contrary to Appellant's arguments, we have held and continue to hold that juveniles may permissibly be sentenced to mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment under these circumstances. See Montgomery v. State , 230 So. 3d 1256, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J. and EISNAUGLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, J.

Appellant, as a juvenile, pled no contest to attempted second-degree murder with a firearm. He is serving a twenty-five-year term of incarceration with a twenty-five-year firearm minimum mandatory coupled with a review hearing that will take place after twenty years. We affirm the postconviction court's summary denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Contrary to Appellant's arguments, we have held and continue to hold that juveniles may permissibly be sentenced to mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment under these circumstances. See Montgomery v. State , 230 So. 3d 1256, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J. and EISNAUGLE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 So. 3d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinnall-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack