Dinks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dinks v. State

561 So. 2d 1280, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3776, 1990 WL 68715

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1990

DocketNo. 88-03275

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 1280 (Dinks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dinks v. State, 561 So. 2d 1280, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3776, 1990 WL 68715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, fifteen years old at the time of the crimes charged in this case, was sentenced as an adult. There was, however, no written decision to impose adult sanctions setting forth findings of fact and reasons as is required by section 39.-lll(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987).

[1281]*1281Therefore, we reverse the sentences and remand for compliance with the statute.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, fifteen years old at the time of the crimes charged in this case, was sentenced as an adult. There was, however, no written decision to impose adult sanctions setting forth findings of fact and reasons as is required by section 39.-lll(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987).

[1281]*1281Therefore, we reverse the sentences and remand for compliance with the statute.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 1280, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3776, 1990 WL 68715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinks-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack