Dinks v. State
561 So. 2d 1280, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3776, 1990 WL 68715
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 1990·No. No. 88-03275·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant, fifteen years old at the time of the crimes charged in this case, was sentenced as an adult. There was, however, no written decision to impose adult sanctions setting forth findings of fact and reasons as is required by section 39.-lll(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987).
[1281]*1281Therefore, we reverse the sentences and remand for compliance with the statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dinks v. State, 561 So. 2d 1280, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3776, 1990 WL 68715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
561 So. 2d 1280 (Dinks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weigel v. State
581 So. 2d 633 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)