Dinkins v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 16, 2010·No. 2010-3033·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Ci1'cuit BEN DINKINS, JR., Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. 2010-3033 Petition for review of the Merit; Systems Protection Board in DC0752090358-1-1. ON MOTION ORDER The petitioner moves for leave to file an addendum to the joint appendix, correcting page numbers in the table of contents. The court notes that the petitioner submitted a corrected appendix on August 11, 2010. Thus, the motion for leave to file an addendum is moot. Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is moot.

DINKlNS V. USPS 2 FoR THE C0UR'r AUG 1 6 /sf Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly cc: David A. Branch, Esq. L`. Misha Preheim, Esq. Clerk U.S. DOUR'F(')%EPFEAL8 FOR 321 me renew macon AUG 1 6 2010 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dinkins v. United States Postal Service, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Dinkins v. United States Postal Service (Dinkins v. United States Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.