Dinkins v. State

196 So. 3d 488, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10430, 2016 WL 4158814
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-1946
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 3d 488 (Dinkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinkins v. State, 196 So. 3d 488, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10430, 2016 WL 4158814 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed pursuant to Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

This court has determined that the petition for writ of habeas .corpus raised a frivolous claim which subjects petitioner to the imposition of sanctions pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes. Accordingly, a certified copy of this opinion shall be provided to the Florida Department of [489]*489Corrections to be forwarded to the appropriate institution or facility fop disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department as provided in section 944.279.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and, JAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 3d 488, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10430, 2016 WL 4158814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinkins-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.