Dinkins v. State

866 So. 2d 765, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 2004 WL 305755
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-5000
StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 765 (Dinkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinkins v. State, 866 So. 2d 765, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 2004 WL 305755 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court’s disposition of the motion. Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
568 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 765, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 2004 WL 305755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinkins-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.