Dinkel v. County of Hudson

141 A. 919, 104 N.J.L. 659, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dinkel v. County of Hudson. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 N.J. Misc. 326
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 1928·Published

Opinion

*660 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dinkel v. County of Hudson, 141 A. 919, 104 N.J.L. 659, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 280 (N.J. 1928).

141 A. 919 (Dinkel v. County of Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.