DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503

389 P.3d 421, 283 Or. App. 914, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 250
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 23, 2017
Docket12C18681; A156042
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 389 P.3d 421 (DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, 389 P.3d 421, 283 Or. App. 914, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff Joseph DiNicola has filed a petition seeking reconsideration of our opinion in this case, DiNicola v. Service Employees Int’l Union Local 503, 281 Or App 706, 383 P3d 924 (2016), raising several contentions. We agree with DiNicola that, at 281 Or App at 717, the reference to “public benefit corporation” should be changed to “mutual benefit corporation.” We reject DiNicola’s remaining contentions.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lincoln Loan Co. v. Estate of George Geppert
477 P.3d 7 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 P.3d 421, 283 Or. App. 914, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinicola-v-service-employees-international-union-local-503-orctapp-2017.