DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503
389 P.3d 421, 283 Or. App. 914, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 250
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 23, 2017·No. 12C18681; A156042·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff Joseph DiNicola has filed a petition seeking reconsideration of our opinion in this case, DiNicola v. Service Employees Int’l Union Local 503, 281 Or App 706, 383 P3d 924 (2016), raising several contentions. We agree with DiNicola that, at 281 Or App at 717, the reference to “public benefit corporation” should be changed to “mutual benefit corporation.” We reject DiNicola’s remaining contentions.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, 389 P.3d 421, 283 Or. App. 914, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
389 P.3d 421 (DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union Local 503) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lincoln Loan Co. v. Estate of George Geppert
477 P.3d 7 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)