Dingman v. Rugg
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 412
This text of 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 412 (Dingman v. Rugg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dingman v. Rugg, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 412 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to [413]*413abide event. Held, tlxat the testimony tending to show that the defendant was indemnified was immaterial and inadmissible, and it may have affected the defendant unfavorably.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dingman-v-rugg-nysupct-1880.