Dingman v. Ard
This text of 33 So. 2d 718 (Dingman v. Ard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal here we are requested to reverse for enumerated reasons the decree of the Chancellor, which, as shown by a careful study of the record, appears to have been based largely on disputes and conflicts in the -evidence. We have given all the testimony appearing in the transcript careful consideration ; the briefs filed in the cause have been read, and the authorities cited examined. It is our view, and we so hold, that we are not justified, as a matter of law, in interfering with the decree appealed from and accordingly the same is affirmed. See Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. 762; Webb v. Webb, 145 Fla. 267, 199 So. 343; Windham v. Windham, 152 Fla. 362, 11 So. (2nd) 797.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 So. 2d 718, 160 Fla. 115, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dingman-v-ard-fla-1948.