Dingle v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dingle v. Coombe

239 A.D.2d 947, 661 N.Y.S.2d 807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D.2d 947 (Dingle v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dingle v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 947, 661 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Corning, J.). We add only that the contention of petitioner that the restriction placed on his correspondence violates his First Amendment right to freedom of association is without merit (see, Matter of Montgomery v Jones, 88 AD2d 1003, 1004). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Corning, J.). We add only that the contention of petitioner that the restriction placed on his correspondence violates his First Amendment right to freedom of association is without merit (see, Matter of Montgomery v Jones, 88 AD2d 1003, 1004). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 947, 661 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dingle-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack