Dingle v. Coombe
239 A.D.2d 947, 661 N.Y.S.2d 807
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Corning, J.). We add only that the contention of petitioner that the restriction placed on his correspondence violates his First Amendment right to freedom of association is without merit (see, Matter of Montgomery v Jones, 88 AD2d 1003, 1004). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dingle v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 947, 661 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).
239 A.D.2d 947 (Dingle v. Coombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery v. Jones
88 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)