Dinger v. Schlumberger Well Services

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Dinger v. Schlumberger Well Services

412 So. 2d 171, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 6953

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 10, 1982

DocketNo. 8626

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 171 (Dinger v. Schlumberger Well Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dinger v. Schlumberger Well Services, 412 So. 2d 171, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 6953 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Diane Faulk v. Schlumberger Well Services, et al., 412 So.2d 171 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1982), in which a separate opinion is being rendered this date, the judgment of the district court is affirmed but amended so as to award Sherry Ann Dinger, as natural tutrix of the minor Mia Margaret Faulk and for her use and benefit, the sum of $121,875.00, and to award Sherry Ann Ding-er, as natural tutrix of the minor Melanie Michelle Faulk for her use and benefit, the sum of $140,069.44. As thus amended the judgment in this case is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed equally between plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellants.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Diane Faulk v. Schlumberger Well Services, et al., 412 So.2d 171 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1982), in which a separate opinion is being rendered this date, the judgment of the district court is affirmed but amended so as to award Sherry Ann Dinger, as natural tutrix of the minor Mia Margaret Faulk and for her use and benefit, the sum of $121,875.00, and to award Sherry Ann Ding-er, as natural tutrix of the minor Melanie Michelle Faulk for her use and benefit, the sum of $140,069.44. As thus amended the judgment in this case is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed equally between plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellants.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 So. 2d 171, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 6953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinger-v-schlumberger-well-services-lactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack