Dinger v. Rothery
166 A. 165, 110 N.J.L. 508, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 542
This text of 166 A. 165 (Dinger v. Rothery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dinger v. Rothery, 166 A. 165, 110 N.J.L. 508, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 542 (N.J. 1933).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Commisioner Eldredge.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 509
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 A. 165, 110 N.J.L. 508, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinger-v-rothery-nj-1933.