Dingelstedt v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Dingelstedt v. United States

87 F. 190, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 F. 190 (Dingelstedt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dingelstedt v. United States, 87 F. 190, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428 (circtsdny 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These electric light carbons, of which lampblack is the chief component, do not seem to be “composed of earthen or mineral substances,” within paragraph 86 of the tariff act of 1894; nor “preparations” or “products of coal tar,” within paragraph 443. They rather seem to be “articles manufactured in whole or in part, not provided for,” under section, 3, dutiable at 20 per cent. Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

These electric light carbons, of which lampblack is the chief component, do not seem to be “composed of earthen or mineral substances,” within paragraph 86 of the tariff act of 1894; nor “preparations” or “products of coal tar,” within paragraph 443. They rather seem to be “articles manufactured in whole or in part, not provided for,” under section, 3, dutiable at 20 per cent. Decision reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 F. 190, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dingelstedt-v-united-states-circtsdny-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack