Dinesh Kumar Shah v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dinesh Kumar Shah v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 9621
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 28, 2012·No. 01-10-01138-CR·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston

Order Reinstating Appeal and Establishing Briefing Schedule

Appellate case name: Dinesh Kumar Shah v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-10-01138-CR

Trial court case number: 1040406

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas

On March 8, 2012, the Court abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a determination of whether retained attorney, Dennis Hester, should be permitted to substitute for court-appointed attorney, Ted Doebbler, as counsel for appellant. The trial court conducted a hearing on April 18, 2012, at which the trial court (1) determined Dennis Hester should be permitted to substitute as counsel for appellant and (2) relieved Ted Doebbler of his duties as court-appointed counsel.

This case is reinstated. The Clerk of this Court is instructed to update this Court's records to reflect that Dennis Hester is appellant's counsel of record on appeal.

Appellant's "Motion to Withdraw Anders Brief and for Court to Instate Briefing Deadlines" is granted. Appellant's brief is due Monday, July 30, 2012. Absent a showing of good cause, no extension of this deadline will be granted. Appellee's brief is due Wednesday, August 29, 2012.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Harvey G. Brown acting individually

Date: June 28, 2012 ----------------------- [pic]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dinesh Kumar Shah v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Dinesh Kumar Shah v. State (Dinesh Kumar Shah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.