Dinardo v. Miller

236 A.D. 713

This text of 236 A.D. 713 (Dinardo v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinardo v. Miller, 236 A.D. 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements: (See Green v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 28 Barb. 9; Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 237 N. W. 846; Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. Reeder, 42 Ind. App. 520; Meese v. City of Fond du Lac, 48 Wis. 323.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.
237 N.W. 846 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)
Green v. Hudson River Rail Road
28 Barb. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Meese v. City of Fond du Lac
4 N.W. 406 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1880)
Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. Reeder
85 N.E. 1042 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinardo-v-miller-nyappdiv-1932.