Dinan v. Stewart
This text of 48 Cal. 567 (Dinan v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears by the certificate of the Clerk of the Court below, filed here in support of the motion to dismiss the appeal, that the notice of appeal was filed on the 28th day of April, 1874, but was not served on the respondent’s attorney until the 1st day of May, 1874.
[568]*568In Columbet v. Pacheco (46 Cal. 650), we held that, under section nine hundred and forty of the Code of Civil Procedure, it was necessary to the taking of an appeal, that the filing and service of the notice should be effected on the same day. It appearing, therefore, that no appeal has been taken in this case, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied.
The amendinent to section nine hundred and forty of the Code of Civil Procedure, if it changed the rule in this respect, did not take effect until July 1, 1874, and, therefore, does not apply to this case.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Cal. 567, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinan-v-stewart-cal-1874.