Dinan v. Marchand

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Dinan v. Marchand

888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 3, 2005·No. SC 17536·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 492 (AC 25754), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Having determined that the trial court improperly had invoked the rule of Dale’s Appeal from Probate, 57 Conn. 127, 17 A. 757 (1888), to exclude evidence in the [918]*918present case, did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the trial court’s evidentiary rulings?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17536. Decided November 3, 2005 Richard L. Albrecht, Courtney A. George and Barbara M. Schellenberg, in support of the petition. W. I. Haslun II and Joyce H. Young, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 492 (AC 25754), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Having determined that the trial court improperly had invoked the rule of Dale’s Appeal from Probate, 57 Conn. 127, 17 A. 757 (1888), to exclude evidence in the [918]*918present case, did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the trial court’s evidentiary rulings?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17536. Decided November 3, 2005 Richard L. Albrecht, Courtney A. George and Barbara M. Schellenberg, in support of the petition. W. I. Haslun II and Joyce H. Young, in opposition.

Dinan v. Marchand, 888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

888 A.2d 84 (Dinan v. Marchand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related