Dinan v. Marchand

888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 3, 2005
DocketSC 17536
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 888 A.2d 84 (Dinan v. Marchand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinan v. Marchand, 888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 492 (AC 25754), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Having determined that the trial court improperly had invoked the rule of Dale’s Appeal from Probate, 57 Conn. 127, 17 A. 757 (1888), to exclude evidence in the [918]*918present case, did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the trial court’s evidentiary rulings?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17536. Decided November 3, 2005 Richard L. Albrecht, Courtney A. George and Barbara M. Schellenberg, in support of the petition. W. I. Haslun II and Joyce H. Young, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dinan v. Marchand
903 A.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinan-v-marchand-conn-2005.