Dinan v. Marchand
This text of 888 A.2d 84 (Dinan v. Marchand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 492 (AC 25754), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Having determined that the trial court improperly had invoked the rule of Dale’s Appeal from Probate, 57 Conn. 127, 17 A. 757 (1888), to exclude evidence in the [918]*918present case, did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the trial court’s evidentiary rulings?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinan-v-marchand-conn-2005.