DINABURG, JACK I. v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY
This text of DINABURG, JACK I. v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY (DINABURG, JACK I. v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
210 CA 16-01203 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
JACK I. DINABURG, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
UNITED REFINING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JOHN T. KOLAGA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. BARRER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered January 22, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant to disqualify counsel for plaintiff.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 15, 2016,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DINABURG, JACK I. v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinaburg-jack-i-v-united-refining-company-nyappdiv-2017.