Dinaali v. Interlaced Social LLC

Opinion

3 Aladdin Dinaali, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01329-JAD-EJY Plaintiff ° Vv. Order Adopting 6 Report & Recommendation to Dismiss Robert G. Luna, et al., Official-Capacity Claims with Prejudice ’ Defendants [ECF No. 5] 8 9 10 On August 19, 2024, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff Aladdin Dinaali’s complaint, 11 ordered that some claims be dismissed with leave to amend, and recommended that Dinaali’s 12 official-capacity claims against Sheriff Luna and California Secretary of State Webber be 13 dismissed with prejudice as bared by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States 14 Constitution.! Any objection to that recommendation was due by September 3, 2024, but 15 Dinaali neither objected nor moved to extend the time to do so. “[N]o review is required of a 16 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is 18 ADOPTED; plaintiffs claims against Sheriff Luna and California Secretary of State Webber in 19 their official capacities are DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to 30 terminate these defendants from this case. a Te, 21 aoe ES Dorsey August 4, 2024 23 24 25 ECF No. 5. 27 !2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 28 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).