Din-Dayal v. Moore Real Estate Trust
This text of 884 N.E.2d 954 (Din-Dayal v. Moore Real Estate Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Din-Dayal was the defendant in a summary process proceeding in the District Court. She asserted counterclaims against the plaintiff (landlord) and moved for an attachment, seeking pretrial security for any money judgment in her favor. A judge denied her motion for an attachment. Din-Dayal’s G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition sought relief from that denial. The landlord has since prevailed on its claim for possession and on Din-Dayal’s counterclaims, and the appellate process has been exhausted. Moore Real Estate Trust v. Din-Dayal, 69 Mass. App. Ct. 1116, S.C., 449 Mass. 1113 (2007). Because DinDayal has not prevailed on any of her claims, her pretrial request for an attachment is moot.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
884 N.E.2d 954, 451 Mass. 1002, 2008 Mass. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/din-dayal-v-moore-real-estate-trust-mass-2008.