Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hialeah

249 So. 2d 63
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 1970·No. No. 70-279·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff below from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, and dismissing the cause with prejudice. Directions to the lower court clerk with reference to preparation of the record were not filed by the appellant as provided for by Rule 3.6(d) (1) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., with the result that the pleadings essential to a consideration of this appeal have not been brought before this court.

In Morceau v. Meader, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 242, 243, the court said: “Where, as here, an appellant’s points require a consideration of the record which was before the trial judge and where there is a failure to bring such record before the appellate court, the contentions of the appellant cannot be decided by an appellate court.”

“ * * * It is the responsibility and the duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 664; Gleim v. Gleim, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 610; Belfield v. Lochner, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 668. * * *” Conlee Construction Co. v. Cay Construction Co., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 792, 797.

For the reason stated, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hialeah, 249 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

249 So. 2d 63 (Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hialeah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johstoneaux
257 So. 2d 86 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)