Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hialeah
This text of 249 So. 2d 63 (Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hialeah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is by the plaintiff below from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, and dismissing the cause with prejudice. Directions to the lower court clerk with reference to preparation of the record were not filed by the appellant as provided for by Rule 3.6(d) (1) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., with the result that the pleadings essential to a consideration of this appeal have not been brought before this court.
In Morceau v. Meader, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 242, 243, the court said: “Where, as here, an appellant’s points require a consideration of the record which was before the trial judge and where there is a failure to bring such record before the appellate court, the contentions of the appellant cannot be decided by an appellate court.”
“ * * * It is the responsibility and the duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 664; Gleim v. Gleim, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 610; Belfield v. Lochner, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 668. * * *” Conlee Construction Co. v. Cay Construction Co., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 792, 797.
For the reason stated, the order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 So. 2d 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimun-investment-inc-v-citizens-federal-savings-loan-assn-of-hialeah-fladistctapp-1970.