Dimonda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dimonda v. State

93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1934481, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-388

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 361 (Dimonda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dimonda v. State, 93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1934481, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant’s claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant’s claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1934481, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimonda-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.