Dimonda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dimonda v. State

93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1934481, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2012·No. No. 4D11-388·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant’s claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant’s claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Dimonda v. State, 93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1934481, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

93 So. 3d 361 (Dimonda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.