Dimock Operating Company, and Joe W. Dimock, D/B/A Dimock Petroleum v. Sutherland Energy Co., LLC
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-15-00297-CV
DIMOCK OPERATING COMPANY, AND JOE W. DIMOCK, D/B/A DIMOCK PETROLEUM, APPELLANTS
V.
SUTHERLAND ENERGY CO., LLC, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 46th District Court Hardeman County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,098, Honorable Dan Mike Bird, Presiding
December 15, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
On December 9, 2015, appellants filed a motion to dismiss appeal that complies
with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). No decision of
this Court having been delivered to date and without passing on the merits of the
appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss appellants’ appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1). Because appellants’ motion does not address costs, costs will be taxed
against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a
timely motion for rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellants will be entertained.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dimock Operating Company, and Joe W. Dimock, D/B/A Dimock Petroleum v. Sutherland Energy Co., LLC (Dimock Operating Company, and Joe W. Dimock, D/B/A Dimock Petroleum v. Sutherland Energy Co., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.