Dimmick v. Pullen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dimmick v. Pullen

161 S.E.2d 318, 117 Ga. App. 609, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1161

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 4, 1968·No. 43589·Published

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

Since this appeal involves a suit in equity for the cancellation of a promissory note, as well as for damages, it appears that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the appeal is accordingly transferred to that court.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur. Argued April 1,1968 Decided April 4,1968. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Huie & Harland, Terrill A. Parker, Harry L. Cashin, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Judge.

Since this appeal involves a suit in equity for the cancellation of a promissory note, as well as for damages, it appears that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the appeal is accordingly transferred to that court.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur. Argued April 1,1968 Decided April 4,1968. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Huie & Harland, Terrill A. Parker, Harry L. Cashin, for appellee.

Dimmick v. Pullen, 161 S.E.2d 318, 117 Ga. App. 609, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

161 S.E.2d 318 (Dimmick v. Pullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.