Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Dimler v. Caldwell

Dimler v. Caldwell

100 A. 154, 87 N.J. Eq. 366, 2 Stock. 366, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 473
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 5, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 A. 154 (Dimler v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dimler v. Caldwell, 100 A. 154, 87 N.J. Eq. 366, 2 Stock. 366, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 473 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

So far as concerns the title to the property we agree with Vice-Chancellor Emery and the chancellor. So far as the decree adjudges that the complainant is entitled to a lien for $750 and [368]*368interest, we have assumed its correctness, since there is no appeal by the defendants from that part of tire decree, and the complainant is not aggrieved thereby. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—Ti-ib Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trejstohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers v. Vogt
145 A. 866 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A. 154, 87 N.J. Eq. 366, 2 Stock. 366, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimler-v-caldwell-nj-1917.