Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan

28 Misc. 2d 587, 207 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2746

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 30, 1960·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since it was disclosed to plaintiff that the printing job was being done for Watko Manufacturing Corp., it became plaintiff’s duty to make inquiry as to who would pay for it, and having faffed to exact a promise from defendants [588] that they would pay for it or that they would be liable for it, plaintiff must look to the disclosed principal, Watko Manufacturing Corp., for payment (see Wright v. Cabot, 89 N. Y. 570).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs. Appeal from order dismissed.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since it was disclosed to plaintiff that the printing job was being done for Watko Manufacturing Corp., it became plaintiff’s duty to make inquiry as to who would pay for it, and having faffed to exact a promise from defendants [588] that they would pay for it or that they would be liable for it, plaintiff must look to the disclosed principal, Watko Manufacturing Corp., for payment (see Wright v. Cabot, 89 N. Y. 570).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs. Appeal from order dismissed.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan, 28 Misc. 2d 587, 207 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

28 Misc. 2d 587 (Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related