Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan

28 Misc. 2d 587, 207 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2746

This text of 28 Misc. 2d 587 (Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dimensional Lithographer, Inc. v. Kogan, 28 Misc. 2d 587, 207 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since it was disclosed to plaintiff that the printing job was being done for Watko Manufacturing Corp., it became plaintiff’s duty to make inquiry as to who would pay for it, and having faffed to exact a promise from defendants [588]*588that they would pay for it or that they would be liable for it, plaintiff must look to the disclosed principal, Watko Manufacturing Corp., for payment (see Wright v. Cabot, 89 N. Y. 570).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs. Appeal from order dismissed.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. . Cabot
89 N.Y. 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Misc. 2d 587, 207 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimensional-lithographer-inc-v-kogan-nyappterm-1960.