Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Company
5 A.2d 691, 122 N.J.L. 379, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 320
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Company, 5 A.2d 691, 122 N.J.L. 379, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1939).
5 A.2d 691 (Dimeglio v. Slonk Construction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Portnoff v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance
920 A.2d 761 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Vieira v. On Shore Construction Co.
688 A.2d 655 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Montgomery v. Abex Corp.
602 A.2d 290 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Torres v. Miller
569 A.2d 301 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.
475 A.2d 544 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Landon v. United States
197 F.2d 128 (Second Circuit, 1952)