Dime Savings Bank v. Davis, No. Cv93 0130550 S (Jul. 10, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7563-B
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 10, 1995·No. No. CV93 0130550 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY PLAINTIFF(#119) The court may grant a motion to substitute a party plaintiff after a judgment of strict foreclosure for the purposes of a deficiency proceeding. See Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationv. Retirement Management Group, 31 Conn. App. 80, 85-86,623 A.2d 517, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 908, 625 A.2d 1378 (1993); New EnglandSavings Bank v. Andruschkevich, 8 CSCR 949 (July 14, 1993, Lager, J.). FGB realty Advisors, Inc. (FGB) has provided evidence that Dime Savings Bank quitclaimed property, and assigned its rights to the deficiency judgment, to FGB. Accordingly, FGB's motion to substitute party plaintiff is granted.

HICKEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dime Savings Bank v. Davis, No. Cv93 0130550 S (Jul. 10, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7563-B (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7563-B (Dime Savings Bank v. Davis, No. Cv93 0130550 S (Jul. 10, 1995)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New England Sav. Bank v. Andruschkevich, No. Cv-91-285341 (Aug. 13, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7263 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Retirement Management Group, Inc.
623 A.2d 517 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)