Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp.

58 A.D.2d 881, 397 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13063
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 1977·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a mortgage foreclosure action, defendants Dubroff and Messinger, as executors, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme [882]*882Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1976, as directed that the receiver of the mortgaged premises pay the sum of $10,105.05 in his possession to the plaintiff. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Subdivision 4 of section 1371 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law is clear and unambiguous and mandates affirmance, however inequitable the result may be. Any relief required to prevent a recurrence of this situation must come through a legislative amendment to subdivision 4 of section 1371 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law and not by judicial interpretation of that section. Latham, J. P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp., 58 A.D.2d 881, 397 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 881 (Dime Savings Bank v. Anshel Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbian Mutual Life Insurance v. Horizons of Schuyler, Inc.
229 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Albany Savings Bank v. Fred Greller Associates, Inc.
178 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hyman Novick Realty Corp.
68 A.D.2d 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)