Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia
640 A.2d 120, 229 Conn. 907, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 112
Opinion
The defendant Rose Marie Cornaglia’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 549 (AC 12098), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Assuming that a finding by the trial court was necessary to enable appellate review of the trial court’s decision, should the Appellate Court have remanded to the trial court for articulation of the reasons for its decision?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia, 640 A.2d 120, 229 Conn. 907, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 112 (Colo. 1994).
640 A.2d 120 (Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dime Savings Bank v. Cornaglia
636 A.2d 1370 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)