Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia
640 A.2d 120, 229 Conn. 907, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 112
This text of 640 A.2d 120 (Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford v. Cornaglia, 640 A.2d 120, 229 Conn. 907, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 112 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The defendant Rose Marie Cornaglia’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 549 (AC 12098), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Assuming that a finding by the trial court was necessary to enable appellate review of the trial court’s decision, should the Appellate Court have remanded to the trial court for articulation of the reasons for its decision?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dime Savings Bank v. Cornaglia
636 A.2d 1370 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
640 A.2d 120, 229 Conn. 907, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dime-savings-bank-of-wallingford-v-cornaglia-conn-1994.