Dime Savings Bank of New York, F.S.B. v. Wu

Connecticut Appellate Court

Dime Savings Bank of New York, F.S.B. v. Wu

640 A.2d 164, 34 Conn. App. 901, 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 112

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedApril 12, 1994

Docket12130

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 640 A.2d 164 (Dime Savings Bank of New York, F.S.B. v. Wu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dime Savings Bank of New York, F.S.B. v. Wu, 640 A.2d 164, 34 Conn. App. 901, 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 112 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this foreclosure action, the reliance by the defendants Peter Z. Wu and Judy M. Wu (defendants) on the case of Cummings & Lockwood v. Gray, 26 Conn. App. 293, 600 A.2d 1040 (1991), for the proposition that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on both the complaint and the counterclaim is misplaced.

In Cummings & Lockwood, the motion for summary judgment was specifically directed to the complaint while here, the plaintiff made a general motion for summary judgment which allowed the court also to resolve the issue of the counterclaim which it properly did.

We have also fully reviewed the record and briefs as to the other claims of the defendants and find them to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI