Dimattia v. Dimattia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Dimattia v. Dimattia

242 So. 2d 886, 257 La. 550, 1971 La. LEXIS 4630

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 27, 1971

DocketNo. 51102

StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 2d 886 (Dimattia v. Dimattia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dimattia v. Dimattia, 242 So. 2d 886, 257 La. 550, 1971 La. LEXIS 4630 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

DIXON, J.,

recused.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank M. Dougherty, Judge of the Second Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jackson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the third day of May, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through her attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIXON, J.,

recused.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank M. Dougherty, Judge of the Second Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jackson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the third day of May, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through her attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 So. 2d 886, 257 La. 550, 1971 La. LEXIS 4630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimattia-v-dimattia-la-1971.