Dimas Gonzalez v. State
This text of Dimas Gonzalez v. State (Dimas Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed August 13, 2020
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals __________
No. 11-19-00274-CR __________
DIMAS GONZALES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 106th District Court Dawson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15-7565
ORDER The sealed portion of the appellate record has now been filed in this court as requested by Appellant.1 Appellant previously requested that the sealed portion of the record be made available to counsel of record. We have determined that the sealed portion of the record should be made available to the attorneys of record in
1 We note that Appellant’s name as it appears in the indictment is Dimas Gonzales and that the name as reflected in the judgment is Dimas Gonzalez. this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g); see also Dees v. State, 508 S.W.3d 312, 319–20 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2013, no pet.). Accordingly, the sealed volume of the supplemental clerk’s record is ordered unsealed but only as to the attorneys of record in this cause for the purpose of preparing the parties’ briefs to be filed in this court. Appellate counsel for Appellant and the State are permitted to review the contents of the sealed record. Counsel may not copy any portion of the sealed record. The parties and their counsel are ordered not to disclose or disseminate any information contained in the sealed records to any other person or entity. Furthermore, if the parties rely upon the contents of the sealed record in their appellate briefs, those briefs are to be filed under seal and in paper form only. In conjunction with this order, the clerk of this court is electronically furnishing a copy of the sealed supplemental clerk’s record to counsel of record, and counsel must delete and destroy their copy and any notes related thereto when this court issues its mandate in this cause. Each counsel is directed to notify the clerk of this court when counsel has complied with this court’s directive.
PER CURIAM
August 13, 2020 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2 Willson, J., not participating.
2 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dimas Gonzalez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dimas-gonzalez-v-state-texapp-2020.